Executive Management
What if the current
fixation on reducing labour costs is only attacking 4% of the cost
of goods sold? According to a recent study, component costs make up
72% of the typical manufacturer’s cost of goods sold.
What if
there was a tool that could help your design teams work
on that 72%, by quickly examining realistic component cost
alternatives?
What if
they could start examining these alternatives—to meet
competition-driven target cost—even before the detailed design
phase?
And, once you had agreed on a design, what if you could get the
best possible quotes from your vendors, because before you asked
them for a quote on a particular part, you already knew what it
cost, based on locale-specific averages?
The most efficient companies in the world are doing all of these
things, using Boothroyd Dewhurst's Design for Manufacturing and
Assembly (DFMA) tools. These practices are routine:
- Rather than just settle for the first concept that works,
their design teams are able to play “what if” with cost,
materials, and processes, until a component meets cost, quality,
and assembly requirements.
- Design teams work directly and efficiently with
manufacturing and costing teams, using a common analysis
platform and communication method. Decisions are driven by
real-world data rather than “we’ve always done it this way,” or
“this is the data we got from suppliers.”
- Designers are able to reduce part count, which significantly
reduces the cost of materials and labour. Harley-Davidson has
used DFMA extensively for this purpose.
- Designers find new efficiencies in assembly and component
standardisation, which are then applied across product lines.
Dell has been particularly adept at this.
- Drawings sent out for quotes include detailed cost analyses,
helping suppliers understand that your team “knows the score”
and gives your suppliers a reasonable basis of comparison as
they build their estimates.
DFMA provides a powerful and efficient tool to help you get
objective answers to your most common and pressing questions:
- What will it cost to manufacture this?
- Where could we cut costs—without sacrificing quality and/or
competitive advantage?
- Have we examined all the alternatives?
- Are we sure this supplier’s price is the best we can do?
- Could we use other methods to manufacture this more quickly
or less expensively?
- Have we looked at the related products and examined how we
could consolidate processes or materials to cut costs?
- What is the competition doing, and how much do we think
they’re spending on that part?
Competitive and cost advantages can be more easily achieved if
your design, manufacturing, and cost management teams have a “what
if” tool they can use to evaluate various alternatives, select the
right one, and then use the results of their evaluation to
successfully manage the design and manufacturing process.
DFMA is the “what if” tool that helps
you lower costs of goods sold, while improving the quality and
manufacturability of your products.
Contact us to learn more
about DFMA and cost management.
|
Cost Management |
Manufacturing |
Design |
You have a target cost
in mind for a new or existing product. What are the main
contributors to the cost of the product? DFMA tools can
answer that question for you. They can also help you work
more effectively with your design and manufacturing
engineers, and outside suppliers.
more >
|
"You want me to
manufacture this design? You're joking, right?" If you find
yourself asking this question more often than you'd like,
DFMA can help. You and your design engineers can quickly
analyse and manipulate different design approaches. The
resulting lean design will contain fewer parts and be easier
to manufacture.
more > |
You can improve the
manufacturability of your design using DFMA software through
product simplification. You can explore alternatives in
processes and materials, and immediately see the cost impact
of your decisions. You can provide factual data to
manufacturing and your managers, so you can all make valid
business decisions about your product design.
more > |

What if we make that simple change?...
- Seems like a reasonable question. Why is
your engineering team leader taking so long to respond? Finally,
he says, “I’ll have to run the numbers and get back to you.”
- It’s obvious that you won’t be making this
decision today, which means that more time will go by before you
have a product making its way to the market. Meanwhile, your
competitor has just launched a cheaper, yet superior product.
- Whatever the question, it always takes too
long to get answers. Calls have to be made to suppliers.
Designers have to change their designs and then recalculate the
cost of the component. Manufacturing has to estimate the cost of
the part. Cost management has to gather input from all parties
and recalculate. Meanwhile, it’s become obvious that one of your
suppliers is overcharging you for a standard part. They have to
be confronted and the contract has to be renegotiated.
- All of these “real world” issues get in the
way of getting straightforward answers to seemingly simple
questions.
- What if all
“running the numbers” meant was that the engineer could simply
plug some new variables into a DFMA model, and click a button to
produce a detailed report, including graphic and tabular data?
- What if your
engineer could run several of these reports prior to your
meeting, in preparation for the questions you’re always asking?
- You would get answers to your questions. You
could spend time discussing the tradeoffs instead of always
asking for more data. You could go to market faster and give
that competitor a run for his money.
Real data. Better decisions. That’s the power of DFMA.
- For more details on DFMA, click here.